Abstract
This study aims to highlight kinds of decisions made by the
Ombudsman’s head considering the nature of these decisions and their
impact on the performance of public administrations regarding the head
of the Ombudsman board as a controlling institution through inductive,
descriptive and analytical approaches followed in studying the subject
material and analyzing it.
This study dealt with a number of topics, notably: kinds of
decisions made by the head of the Ombudsman, the nature of these
decisions, the extent of their obligation, and the means available to the
ombudsman to implement his decisions and compel public administration
to them. The most important findings of the researcher were to
activate the means of binding the administrations to implement the
recommendations of the Board of Ombudsman, especially the media.
This requires efforts by Ombudsman to urge the National
Assembly and the Council of Ministers to bind departments not cooperating
with the Ombudsman to obey.