Abstract
This research discusses the issue of disagreement between grammarians
and the fact of Grammar Schools. In order to investigate this case,
the study is conducted based on the principles of ancient grammarians
according to scientific objective analysis for their arguments and opinions.
It is well-known that the subject of disagreement between Arab
grammarians received a great interest among scientists in the past and the
present, so the idea of the difference between grammarians and their classification
in different schools on the basis of geography have become stable
and a reality in the minds of researchers, that is an undeniable fact. In
addition to the two schools in Basra and Kufa, Baghdad school was found.
Schools of Andalusia, Egypt and the Levant emerged ofterwards.
The research found that the rules of Arabic are based on fixed
principles and all grammarians efforts depend on these principles. Theory
and methodology are compatible for all grammarians. The basic principle
is to listen to and analyze the language of the Arabs to create rules.
Grammarians have mostly used the same terminology. The use of
a limited number of terms does not mean that there is a new school. Thus,
differences between grammarians do not imply they belong to different
schools because the points of agreement are much more than the issues of
dispute, then those so-called schools were not homogeneous in the study
of language issues. Differences between grammarians in the same school
may exceed differences between grammarians of different ones whether
the differences were between those who belong to one school or between
those who belong to different schools, they all differ only in the branches
and not on the original principles of Arabic grammar.